Natural language is a powerful interface, but it’s a lossy projection of what agents need to coordinate on. Intentions, timing, attention, and affect all matter, and most of them don’t survive the text bottleneck.

Open question: what does a grounding signal look like if we stop privileging text? Some candidates I want to think through:

  • Embodied state traces: position, velocity, gaze direction as first-class citizens.
  • Attention as a signal: what an agent isn’t looking at is as informative as what it is.
  • Counterfactual rollouts: a short imagined future as part of the message.

Prof. Freda Shi’s work on how grounding actually emerges inside model computations is a useful empirical handle on this: it suggests the signal we need may already be latent in models we have, if we knew where to look.

See also: Every conditioning choice is a hidden assumption.